Quik help for Reviewes

1- General Guidelines

As a reviewer, your role is critical in ensuring the quality and integrity of published research. Here are key guidelines to help you navigate the review process:

Timely Evaluation

Provide a detailed, constructive, and unbiased evaluation within the assigned period. Notify the editor promptly if you need an extension.

Confidentiality

Treat the manuscript and any associated data as confidential. Do not distribute or discuss any information regarding the submitted manuscript before publication.

Conflict of Interest

Report any conflict of interest to the editor and decline the review if a conflict exists.

Originality and Scientific Accuracy

Assess the manuscript for originality, scientific accuracy, and relevance to the field. Identify any instances of plagiarism or research misconduct and report them to the editor.

Constructive Feedback

Provide specific, actionable suggestions for improving the manuscript. Highlight strengths as well as areas that need improvement.

2- How to Submit Your Review

To submit your review, please follow these steps on the ASJP platform:

Log In

Access the ASJP platform and log in with your credentials.

Access the Manuscript

Navigate to the “Reviewer” section and find the manuscript assigned to you.

Review Form

Complete the review form provided on the platform. Ensure that your comments are clear and well-organized.

Recommendation

Select your recommendation for the manuscript: Accept, Minor Revision, Major Revision, or Reject.

Submit

Submit your completed review and recommendation through the ASJP platform.

3- Evaluating Manuscript Components

Title and Abstract

Is the title clear and informative? Does the abstract summarize the key points effectively?

Introduction

Does the introduction provide sufficient background and clearly state the research question or hypothesis?

Methodology

Is the methodology appropriate and adequately described? Are the techniques and tools used suitable for the research question?

Results

Are the results clearly presented and supported by the data? Are the figures and tables appropriate and well-constructed?

Discussion and Conclusion

Does the discussion interpret the results appropriately? Are the conclusions supported by the findings?

References

Are the references relevant and up-to-date? Check for any missing citations that are crucial for the context of the study.

By adhering to these guidelines, you will contribute to the enhancement of the manuscript and uphold the standards of scientific publishing. Thank you for your valuable contribution as a reviewer.